We
think of poetry as rhyme,
Similarity
ending every line,
As
if this was the will of God.
Yes,
it’s true I see you nod.
But
no it is not in the history of our talk.
Early
erudite scribers did not end English
Verse
with varied vocabulary
Of
sounds of similarity
It
probably was not from purity.
Spelling
Old English was enough a task.
At
some point some poet arrived
Who
took a stab and rhyming tried,
But
like here resulted in feeble rime
And
left it ‘til Chaucer shuffled by.
Yes,
similar syllables he did not eschew
Ah,
Chaucer knew his way around a rime or two,
Perhaps
his forms were his own and new,
As
he spread his rhymes through and through
In
complex patterns that ring true
To
ears raised on the Romantic lines
From
Byron, Keats and Shelley’s times.
Though
I came to poetry through the proclivities of Poe,
Embracing
the spacing of rhythm and rhyme
I’ve
watched the full circle back to non-ringing ends,
Probably
owing some knowing of Walt Whitman
And
the blue-collar
Bellow
and blast of Sandburg,
the
dropping of propriety proper by cummings
Or
the Howls of the Beats, Bukowski and such,
And
a love of it all. In my life I have gathered,
If
it communicated, rhyme or not hasn’t mattered.
No comments:
Post a Comment